Results 11 to 20 of 83
-
10-31-2008, 10:44 PM #11
So your not voting for Mccain Palin either since she is the biggest socialist of the group. And since his tax plan will take taxes back to what they were under Clinton I guess Bill was a socialist also?
Obama wants to give low income people welfare and Mccain wants to give the rich and companies corporate welfare so it's a choice between who you want to get the welfare..
And I STILL haven't heard how mccain economic plan is ANY different then Bush? And that has worked so great
I think it's pretty obvious that trickle down economics are a joke and don't work the rich get richer and the poor get screwed.
My reason for not voting for Mccain are
He's the most selfish person to run for president, his whole life has been Mccain first. Now he tries to play it off as "country first" sorry a tiger doesn't change it's stripes. And the caving and picking of Palin over Ridge, Huck. , Leiberman was final draw.
I have a simple reason not to be voting for Obama it has nothing to do with policy(his are 10x better then mccain) it has to do with the way he has handled himself from the beginning.
The way he ran the primary was an insult to people who supported Clinton (from turning Bill into a racist to only going to big cities and ignoring the small towns). He stole the primary, if you look at the caucas(which are a joke) states he ran up huge numbers(but when they had elections in those states also Clinton either won or came really close). If Florida and Michigan had been in play it would have been a different race. And he has continued his ego trip into the general election thinking he is above tough questions and didn't even consider Hillary for the second in command.
-
-
10-31-2008, 11:44 PM #12
i'd have to agree with you. except for this socialist BS, neither are and the campaining in the general.
bush economics is a joke and 4 more years of failed policies is not what we need.
Obama has definetly run the cleaner campaign than McCain.
As for "lack of experience", in my opinion he has sufficient years under his belt. Working in the community for numerous years where the problems are really hitting home is experience as well as serving on the state legislature. In his time in the Senate he proved he could cross party lines and get major legislation passed working along side Sen. Coburn & Sen. Lugar.
Obama doesn't have much foreign policy experience, SO WHAT! To start off he has some, member of Foreign Relations commitee as well as chairman of senate sub-commitee of European Affairs. looking back on history, these seem like adequate credentials - look at Lincoln, FDR, Truman, and especially Reagan. (disregard military experience).
in my opinion, smear tactics by association should not play a factor. for every red flag obama has, McCain has one too. (for ex. G. Gordon Liddy)
We can't afford 4 more years of similar policy.
-
10-31-2008, 11:47 PM #13
good call for me too.
-
-
10-31-2008, 11:47 PM #14
because he is not qualified to be president,no experience at anything,just a puppet of the dems
ill vote barr
-
10-31-2008, 11:49 PM #15
don't agree with any of it besides why you're not voting for him. :), obama and his wife LOVE pulling the race card whenever possible.
-
-
10-31-2008, 11:49 PM #16
some of our greatest presidents had less experience than Obama.
-
10-31-2008, 11:51 PM #17
who????
-
-
10-31-2008, 11:52 PM #18
good one...4 years in u.s. senate aint crap...
-
10-31-2008, 11:57 PM #19
i think its more like 4 years in the senate running for president and voting present
-
11-01-2008, 12:01 AM #20
, sounds like the truth to me.
-












