Results 41 to 48 of 48
-
08-13-2009, 12:05 PM #41
prove it
Easy, reread all of your posts.
-
-
08-13-2009, 12:18 PM #42
it's as simple as this....you really don't know what you're talking about.
I believe you have some understanding of the law, but clearly not any on how it is applied.
If you think Obama had to make a phone call to get Gates off on a Disorderly Conduct charge, then you have done nothing but prove my first two sentences in this post correct!
-
08-13-2009, 12:44 PM #43
No Red, your wrong. instead iof just sayign things, back them up. Your thoughts are completely off base and wrong. Period.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_suspicion
the Police had reasonable suspicion and a right to investigate whether gates belonged in the house. Part of that woudl be Gates Showing ID and him proving he belonged there.
Heres the one for Plain View:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_view_doctrine
Liek I said, if they were in there legally, they can seize the drugs and charge accordingly.
Your the one who does not know what you are talking about.
-
-
08-13-2009, 12:45 PM #44
I was merely pointing otu that phone calls are made for minor charges liek that all the time. And by that I was stating you cant say its wrong when others do it all the time. I dont knwo if Obama did it, or if another friend did it, or whoever. I just dont see it as a big deal if soemoen did.
-
08-13-2009, 01:29 PM #45
oh man Grim ... don't use Wiki as a source to fight a battle. Anyone can post and edit anything they want to on Wikipedia and it's not looked at as a credible source.
I don't know anything about what you guys are bickering about but I do know that I don't believe a word I read on Wikipedia.
-
-
08-13-2009, 01:37 PM #46
Im aware of that, but They are for the most part spot on on those. Those were the first things that popped up on searches. IF someoen has sopemthign to challenge them, Ill search for more in depth items.
-
08-13-2009, 03:42 PM #47
JeRmZ beat me to it.
-
-
08-14-2009, 10:36 PM #48
http://law.jrank.org/pages/13056/Arizona-v-Hicks.html
Then here you go.
Arizona V. Hicks. Read through it and you will see that it clearly spells out the concept of plain view. How much more do you need to see?
Give me a little bit and Ill locate the rulings on reasonable suspicion.
-
Originally Posted by RedGoneWILD 
