Results 31 to 40 of 186
-
10-03-2009, 12:05 AM #31
Possibly. We have never seen an example though yet that I am aware of. You also have to factor in the axis wobble of the Earth. This seems to be the biggest cause of Ice Ages. We will either get too hot or too cold because of our actions. Link below.
http://www.livescience.com/environme...arth_tilt.html
-
-
10-03-2009, 12:30 AM #32
Melting of the Siberian and Alaskan Tundra as well as other similar environments will release large amounts of methane into the atmosphere which has a greater greenhouse effect than CO2. The thawed out rotting compost will then release the methane which has a catylistic effect on the remaining tundra, icecaps, glaciers etc. Then begins a domino effect. This is common science applied to a prediction/theory/hypothesis or whatever you want to call it created by the scientists themselves. I do realise the manipulation of the circumstance for profit gain and control by corporations and the government exist but someone has to regulate the system. Us as a human race should be given that responsibility, not people we hope have good judgement and should trust. Right now collectively as a planet we are a bunch of fuel, energy consuming Junkies. there are tons and tons of alternative way we can modify ALL of our technology in a less selfish way but are only given the "nuclear alternative" which is far too dangerous therefore we remain the same.
-
10-03-2009, 12:32 AM #33
I didn't even know about the methane release from the tundra, icecaps, etc. Do you have an article I can read about it?
-
-
10-03-2009, 12:35 AM #34
It was part of a radio interview with Michio Kaku. I have it on MP3 if you want to shoot me your Emaill addy I can attach it for you.
-
10-03-2009, 01:14 AM #35
No, you missed the point...by a long shot...as usual. Your list of ingenious, infallible questions is proof of that.
And I don't complain for hours on end, pitch a temper tantrum like a 6 year old, and demand reparations be made when I get offended...I just consider the source.
Just for fun, I am going to do this simply for you. I will ask you a series of questions and you tell me which is wrong.
-Is Mars a planet?
-Is carbon dioxide a chemical compound?
-Is Mars' atmosphere 95% carbon dioxide?
-Does carbon dioxide trap heat?
-Is the surface temperature range of Mars around a high of 68F to a low of -190F?
-
-
10-03-2009, 01:31 AM #36
You can not even answer the simple questions. LOL. Avoid the truth. Continue you confirmation bias. You only look for information that confirms your beliefs. LOL.
-
10-03-2009, 01:36 AM #37
Read my edit...care to answer my simple questions?
-
-
10-03-2009, 01:41 AM #38
Do not answer my questions. I do not really care. You never admit when your wrong and you change the subject. Good job. Typical tactics from people who do not want to admit the truth. LOL.
-
10-03-2009, 01:43 AM #39
Ha...ok, I'll answer your questions:
-Is Venus a planet? yes
-Is carbon dioxide a chemical compound? yes
-Is Venus' atomsphere 97% carbon dioxide? roughly, yes
-Does carbon dioxide trap heat? yes
-Is the surface temperature of Venus around 900 degress F? yes
-What do cars and factories admit in mass quantities on this planet? CO2
Now your turn to answer mine.
-
10-03-2009, 01:44 AM #40
Mar's core is cold and is only one-thrid the size of the Earth. Venus is about the same size as the earth and has an active core. Your comparsion is flawed by your ignorance on the topic
-
Originally Posted by garnett_21 
