Results 251 to 260 of 288
-
08-31-2010, 05:34 PM #251
If they weren't moving SD to SyFy, they could unite the shows, but I don't see Raw moving to SD, so just a lot of matches with the other brand, can't have Raw going for just the WWE/WHC title, and SD going for the US/IC title
-
-
08-31-2010, 05:58 PM #252
Double post
-
09-01-2010, 10:14 AM #253
the reason they have 2 shows is because of all the talent they have. They cant show all the talent on one show. The worst part is that alot of your top guys that are in the title hunt wont be in it anymore like edge y2j swagger rey mystereo etc
-
-
09-01-2010, 10:21 AM #254
SD is boring and as of late RAW is also. And the PPV have been a let down for the price as of late. It is sad when a buddy and I can tell you how the shows are going to be months out. They need new writes or something just same story lines over and over. I am starting to watch TNA more and more.
-
09-01-2010, 11:22 AM #255
Agree 100% wwe has always had a problem with good storylines thats why wcw shut them down when turner had it. Tna atleast has some good storylines and honestly tna has 4x the talent wwe ever thought about. I can sit her and only name about 6 people that actually have good in ring skills in wwe.
-
-
09-01-2010, 11:31 AM #256
TNA doesn't have storylines, thats why they have horrible ratings, that and they think Tommy Dreamer = ratings.
And really, only 6 guys in the WWE can wrestle? hahaHidden Content
Dan LeFevour PC 192/283
-
09-01-2010, 11:53 AM #257
Yes 6 guys have good ring skills in wwe, And dreamer did equal ratings look at the ppv buys that he hosted.
-
-
09-01-2010, 11:54 AM #258
Name these 6 guys then....
Dreamer equals ratings
Their buyrate was still horrible, it was just good because they sell so terrible most the time..
-
09-01-2010, 01:52 PM #259
TNA actually has very competitive ratings, especially to Smackdown even with having a fraction of the production costs, and easily beats out WWE NXT and WWE Superstars. WWE has much more than 6 guys that can be considered great wrestlers but the percentage overall is smaller compared to the skill set of TNA guys. With how much of a product that RAW is it usually gets a ratings share of about 3.0-3.5 per week while TNA is in the 1.0-1.5 range per week
http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1282771626
-
09-01-2010, 02:11 PM #260
1.0 ratings aren't 'competing' TNA was pulling better ratings last year..who cares if they beat out superstars or NXT, NXT usually is getting the same overall ratings anyway, if not higher, and superstars is a jobber show, TNA should have a higher rating then it.
Until Russo is gone TNA will have no storylines or storylines that make no sense, and until Hogan/Bischoff are gone guys who main evented 15 years ago will continue to do so even if they're past their prime
-















