Results 81 to 90 of 146
-
10-21-2010, 09:23 AM #81
UM, the link you gave in post #32 only says EXACTLY what you copied & pasted as your post regarding Hill being a starter on 10 NFL teams. That would be the writers opinion, and if you are willing to copy & paste that as an argument then you fully agree with that.
I only write this because I too am curious as to which 10 teams would want Hill starting for them, so please enlighten us.
-
-
10-21-2010, 09:40 AM #82

I can think of MORE than 10 teams that could use Shaun Hill! (OK, maybe at least 8)
-
10-21-2010, 02:09 PM #83
Since the members demanded my opinion on which ten teams would start Shaun Hill. I will type out approximately ten teams without taking a research.
Cardinals
Browns
Bills
Jaguars
Bengals
Dolphins
Raiders
Panthers
49ers
Vikings (Brett Favre is already done, he isn't going to be the same from last year. The Vikings are now a circus show again.)
-
-
10-21-2010, 02:12 PM #84

Cardinals (You are right)
Browns (Eh, maybe for now)
Bills (Yes)
Jaguars (No)
Bengals (No)
Dolphins (No)
Raiders (Toss up)
Panthers (Toss up)
49ers (No)
Vikings (They have Farve, so No)
I count 5 with 3 being toss ups.
-
10-21-2010, 02:51 PM #85
Cardinals yes until Kurt gets done dancing lol
Browns only cause everyone is hurt and McCoy is not ready so maybe start by default
Bills I am a maybe
Jaguars I go with no
Bengals are you crazy
Dolphins nope Henne is not that bad
Raiders I would say yes but he would just be another bad QB out there
Panthers yes only cause Clausen is not ready
49ers a no if they wanted him they would have keep no matter what your link says
Vikings no be cause there is no way in the world they woulld start a bacup over Brett
So I give you 5 with 2 of those only because the rookies are not ready or a player is hurt.
-
-
10-21-2010, 04:01 PM #86
Please update yourself with 2010 season.
-
10-21-2010, 04:04 PM #87
LoL. I know I have pwned you about the facts on your face. You still don't even want to admit it. You're the type of ignorant who can't swallow the facts.
-
-
10-21-2010, 04:10 PM #88
no one tossed in Seattle in the mix
also the Niners got rid of Hill because they wanted to give Alex Smith the job because of how much he was making even though Hill beat him for the job and the team was more successful under Hill because he doesn't make the mistakes that Smith did
-
10-21-2010, 04:59 PM #89
What facts? That you can cut aand paste? Yes you are good at give you that. Just cause a blogger can write ddoesnt mean it is true but maybe youare the type of kid that believes everything you read. I didn't read your link cause didn't think need to since you posted all over here. Funny thing is your list didn't even have the Lions on it I would think that would be 1st ssince to you he is better than Stafford. Maybe you even doubt yourself lol
Might what to watch tthe name calling before the mod talk to you just a heads up
-
10-21-2010, 05:42 PM #90
seattle problem they have not had a good back since shaun which makes matt throw to much still. Think he is better qb than hill.
Also sorry for any type o's work from my phone wanted to get that out before talk trash on it lol
-














