View Poll Results: Would you pay $1000 for a part of the Leafs???
- Voters
- 33. This poll is closed
-
Yes
5 15.15% -
No
20 60.61% -
I would pay more than $1000 for a bigger share
8 24.24% -
I would pay less than $1000 for a smaller share
0 0%
Results 11 to 16 of 16
-
03-28-2011, 02:38 PM #11
It's bad enough for the board to be meddling with hockey operations, it's going to be even worse when it's owned by a thousand idiot arm-chair GMs.
-
-
03-28-2011, 02:42 PM #12
That was my first thought but going further into it:
Let's say you do, in fact, reap dividends. Great! You're entitled to 1/1,000,000 of 66%. That means if the team makes $100,000,000 profit you're entitled to a whopping $66! At that rate you'd make your money back in only 16 short years. After that, it's allllll gravy.
This of course hinges on my math being right.
-
03-28-2011, 04:18 PM #13
As much of sheer lunacy as the idea of this is (don't want to sound like I believe otherwise) remember that the Teachers are NOT selling 2/3s of the Leafs. They're selling 2/3s of Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment. Leafs are only 1 asset. The Raptors, ACC, Toronto FC (Soccer), BMO Place (Soccer Stadium), and MLSE's real estate holding are all part of the company.
2 billion is probably pretty close.
-
-
03-28-2011, 04:21 PM #14
Thanks, I admittedly completely missed that. In that case, the cost does seem much more justified, at least on the surface. I'd first like to check at least their financial statements and notes, but I'm sure there are plenty of people willing to just write the cheque.
-
03-29-2011, 08:49 AM #15
I simply look at it as having ownership in a sports franchise. Even the worst of those appreciate in value. For that reason only, I think it would be a wise investment that would be hard to match in any other sector.
-
-
04-21-2011, 01:34 PM #16
Any other thoughts?
-


















