Results 91 to 100 of 100
-
01-25-2012, 01:47 PM #91

could i have handed him my phone so he could check my call log/texts?
-
-
01-25-2012, 01:48 PM #92
If I were the responding officer I would have gladly checked your text in/outbox and sent you on your way 30 seconds later. Thats honestly the best thing you could have done in the situation.
-
01-25-2012, 01:52 PM #93

its not a privacy thing?
-
-
01-25-2012, 01:54 PM #94
If your giving consent for us to go through your phone history and are willing to sign a waiver saying so there is no privacy issue. At least here in Michigan anyway.
-
01-25-2012, 01:56 PM #95

interesting, california is a crazy place so who knows here.
-
-
01-25-2012, 01:57 PM #96
I'd be willing to bet that if you gave them consent they would have no problem going through your phone without there being a privacy problem.
Good luck on your court date.
-
01-25-2012, 01:58 PM #97

thanks.
see ya guys.
-
-
01-25-2012, 02:54 PM #98
Following indiana's law the officer has no right to take or look at your phone. However if it proved my innocence I'd more than likely waive the right.
-
01-25-2012, 03:21 PM #99
I'm not one to sit here and blame either you or the police officer about the cell phone. I agree that you take your phone records to court to prove you were not texting or calling and I am sure a judge will rule in your favor. I believe you if you say you weren't using the phone (texting/calling). And I do believe you will probably win your case.
Only other thing I want to say about the comment you made about the seal belt law not being clear cut. Are you saying you were in your car, stopped at a red light, with the engine running in park and pulled your seat belt off? If so, I just want to share this with you. (this is NC law and I cannot speak on the laws from your state).
If you leave a bar/club/whichever and you are drunk and you get behind your wheel, do not crank the car up and a cop sees you, they still can arrest you for a DWI. Do I agree with this law, absolutely not. But the way the law sees it, at that point you become the driver of that vehicle and if the car can move even in park you are driving and responsible for that car. In comparision, the seat belt ticket, you were still responsible for that vehicle at that time and it was running and in traffic. Sorry I can't agree with you there. But I am glad you got it dismissed
So I can't agree with you about the law being unclear about the seat belt issue. I have a friend who had his seal belt on, draped his left shoulder over it, got pulled by highway patrol who gave him a seat belt ticket. Yes his selt belt was on, but it was not on correctly.
I am not trying to start another blow up just trying to give some points about the law here, at least North Carolina law. Sorry, I don't know your states law.Last edited by SLNoble13; 01-25-2012 at 03:23 PM.
-
01-25-2012, 03:24 PM #100
actually im good, you're rightLast edited by lloydr04; 01-25-2012 at 03:29 PM.
-














