Results 11 to 16 of 16
-
02-22-2012, 07:20 PM #11
I would never spend over 100$ on a piece of cardboard with ink on it....lol
-
-
02-22-2012, 07:41 PM #12
Another possibility is that both bidders intentionally "stuck it to" the seller. In other words, niether ever intended to buy the card and for some reason placed bids that would prohibit a legit sale to a third bidder. Some interesting things going on with the seller's feedback too. I can understand the nuclear theory, but surely bids over $8,800 for this card are beyond that reasoning.
Also, note that the high bid was placed before the second highest bid so that rules out one buddy helping another as the second bidder did nothing more than drive up the final value.
-
02-22-2012, 08:04 PM #13

I agree 100%. I have a friend that does this (maybe not that high a bid lol). But if he wants a card bad enough he will drop a big bid just to confirm he gets it... doesn't always work.
-
-
02-22-2012, 08:06 PM #14
It seemed to be something along those lines, but I wanted to share and clarify!
Thanks!
-
02-22-2012, 08:31 PM #15
I once put a bunker-buster bid (not quite nuclear LOL) on a Gorges card /5 that I really wanted "just to be safe" and make sure I didn't get sniped. Ended up needing all but $3.25 of that supposed "padding" bid.
Habs fan and collector! Current PC's: Nick Suzuki, Cole Caufield, and Lane Hutson...., and of course...
-
-
02-22-2012, 09:22 PM #16
...
Could also be a Double-Shill, to gain interest to the card for when it lists again.
Nobody's mentioned this one.
...
-




















