Results 41 to 50 of 167
-
05-14-2012, 05:24 PM #41BANNED
its a logical argument when arguing for the religious side, you cannot automatically assume Christianity is the dominate and thus correct one..
-
-
05-14-2012, 05:53 PM #42
I'm sure you have already read this, but if you haven't.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...-fossil-record
There are many other specific articles on the site if you want to get into the specifics.
-
05-14-2012, 06:49 PM #43
I have read it before but thanks for the link. You should google Dr. Andrew Snelling. You will be quite surprised by some of his earlier literature on geology. No one, absolutely NO ONE, takes him seriously in the scientific community.
-
-
05-14-2012, 07:10 PM #44
Not true.
You cant be talking about the no answers in genesis article can you? You should look up the author of that article...
-
05-14-2012, 07:18 PM #45
I don't know what article you are talking about. I was referring to articles he has written with no religious context at all. Articles in which he talks about the Earth being millions of years old.
-
-
05-14-2012, 07:33 PM #46
I'm assuming you got your info from this article, as it's the only one about the topic.
http://www.noanswersingenesis.org.au/realsnelling.htm
Just found this.
http://www.trueorigin.org/ca_as_01.asp
What does that have to do with the validity of his articles anyway?Last edited by boba; 05-14-2012 at 07:54 PM.
-
05-14-2012, 09:44 PM #47
It has everything to do with the validity of his articles. He completely contradicts himself. No "scientist" puts their name on a report that they are getting paid for if they do not believe what they write. His attempt to explain it that way is pathetic.
Regardless of all that. The FACT that his assertion that ALL the fossils were deposited during one geological event in time is preposterous. It defies ALL logic. I wonder how he explains the creation of coal or oil or diamonds for that matter?
It is a shame that all the Creationist believers keep touting him as their SCIENTIST on the subject. Can't really blame them though, it's not like they have any alternative other than him.
-
-
05-14-2012, 11:33 PM #48
Excellent point!
And I would argue that the most fascinating creation story I have ever heard is the ancient Greek one.....I suppose that should be taught along side with evolution.
"In the begining there was only chaos. Then out of the void appeared Erebus, the unknowable place where death dwells, and Night. All else was empty, silent, endless, darkness. Then somehow Love was born bringing a start of order. From Love came Light and Day. Once there was Light and Day, Gaea, the earth appeared."
^This is EXCELLENT and much more poetic than Genesis 1:1....our Children SHOULD decide, maybe this is the way Creation started....Why not?
Now....unto "the Flood"....there are so many articles and videos debunking that myth, and since I know how much people love seeing videos, here is a great debunking the flood video:
[youtube]_sD_7rxYoZY[/youtube]
-
05-15-2012, 12:16 AM #49
Here is MORE Evidence against "the flood":
The Fossil rock layers
Answer me this creationists.....if God created Dinosaurs and humans together and there was no evolution, why have we NEVER found a human skeleton alongside dinosaur bones?
If the flood really occurred, shouldn't we see all types of animals jumbled up together.....and yet that's NOT what the evidence presents.
There's a reason why 99% of scientists accept evolution.....because the evidence is too great.
Scientist can't go against facts and evidence....and there's a reason why Christians don't like science.
It debunks their beliefs!Last edited by JustAlex; 05-15-2012 at 12:20 AM.
-
05-15-2012, 09:23 AM #50
using wikipedia as a source reference? highschools and middleschools have even banned wiki
and depending who you ask, there has been not only bones but footsteps of man and dino side by side
and where does the bible say dinosaurs and humans were created together? or are we back to the 6000 year old earth?
-
Originally Posted by AUTaxMan 
