Results 41 to 50 of 56
-
09-29-2012, 04:09 PM #41
ensbergcollector ... you are delusional. He hasn't been doing any of that. How dare you put your own meaning to his words.
-
-
09-29-2012, 04:44 PM #42

wickabee, i could agree with that
-
09-29-2012, 05:06 PM #43
Your hypocrisy is getting old, Habs.
Thanks. Glad to know someone is reading the posts instead of just the names of the posters. It's quite refreshing.
-
-
09-29-2012, 07:50 PM #44
I have never seen anyone manipulate an online debate as much-well as Wickabee has. He has changed the argument that was the topic at hand that he couldn't win, to an argument about whether or not he put words into someones mouth. Wickabee, well done, I think...
-
09-30-2012, 12:07 PM #45
I love it. Habs makes an accusation, I defend myself an now I'm manipulating the argument.
Whatever happened to comprehension.
Jeez, next Habs is going to tell me I said ensberg is delusional...
I bet most of you can't even remember what I was saying, or even read it now for the first time.Last edited by Wickabee; 09-30-2012 at 12:12 PM.
-
-
09-30-2012, 12:41 PM #46

something about beer?
-
09-30-2012, 12:42 PM #47
Let`s look at what started this crap:
So, by adding that white people can be racist too, I somehow `morphed`someone`s thought. Anyone want to tell me how that makes sense, because it doesn`t.
-
-
09-30-2012, 12:52 PM #48
You know, it wouldn't surprise me if someone else genuinely thought that, the way this thread is going.
-
09-30-2012, 12:54 PM #49
Look closely at your post:
"This is true, but if you're going to say no one voted McCain because Obama is black I'm going to say you're a dreamer. Jackson was just public about it. So, basically, you're mad at him for being honest?"
This statement pre-emptively links that thought to ensbergcollector, even though he did not say anything like it. Just so you can present an argument that he wasn't even opposing. It gives the appearance to someone not following along closely that ensberg thinks this. It also avoids the point ensberg was making. It's a classic ploy. Used so regularily by you that you don't even realize you are doing it. So yes, in a word: morphed.
-
09-30-2012, 01:10 PM #50
This statement pre-emptively links that thought to ensbergcollector, even though he did not say anything like it. Just so you can present an argument that he wasn't even opposing. It gives the appearance to someone not following along closely that ensberg thinks this. It also avoids the point ensberg was making. It's a classic ploy. Used so regularily by you that you don't even realize you are doing it. So yes, in a word: morphed.[/QUOTE]
Habs, read. Slowly.
"if you're going to say no one voted McCain because Obama is black I'm going to say you're a dreamer."
and if he does he is. Tell me, though, where I said he DOES think that? You see, my statement would require him to think that to be a dreamer. I didn't say he thinks that. I didn't even suggest he thinks that. I said "if he thinks that, he's a dreamer" and I'll stand by it.
I'll put it this way, if I said, "if you think the world is flat, you're a dreamer" did I just say you think the earth is flat? No.
Not that what I actually said ever made one lick of difference to you. Judging from you history of responses to my posts, you're probably now going to tell me I somehow said you orchestrated 9/11.
Of course, I could be wrong about that. You could find some other thing that never happened to blame me for. Why stick to reality, right habs?
-













