Results 31 to 40 of 96
-
05-14-2012, 03:43 PM #31
Stupid flopper
-
-
05-14-2012, 03:44 PM #32
Nash and Malone have two MVP's and no rings, does that mean both of them are overrated?
-
05-14-2012, 03:47 PM #33
I always find it amusing when people judge how good an individual is/was/will be based off of a team accomplishment.
-
-
05-14-2012, 03:47 PM #34
Nope, because they aren't called the greatest players ever. The fact both players haven't/never won rings taints their legacy though, no doubt about it.Hidden Content
Dan LeFevour PC 192/283
-
05-14-2012, 03:51 PM #35
Hmmm, not sure I agree that if a player doesn't win a title, his legacy is tainted. Barkley is considered one of the best PF ever without a ring, if he had won a ring, he wouldn't be any higher on the list.
-
-
05-14-2012, 03:55 PM #36
I dont feel rings define you as a all time great, i guess John Stockton and Malone are not all time greats, Barkley, Ewing.
Robery Horry must be a all time great becasue he has like 7 rings lol
-
05-14-2012, 04:04 PM #37
This thread makes me laugh. That's all I'm going to say
-
-
05-14-2012, 04:08 PM #38
I put this on my calender to bump again in 2021
-
05-14-2012, 04:14 PM #39
Didn't J. West go to the NBA finals nine years in a row and lose every year?
-
05-14-2012, 07:20 PM #40
Players who are superstar players are defined, specifically in Basketball, by how many rings they have.
Horry isn't a superstar, rings don't define him, but i'll say this: there's a reason he was called "Big Shot Rob"
-
Originally Posted by gladdyontherise 
