Results 31 to 40 of 56
-
12-30-2006, 06:59 PM #31
thank you for agreeing with me lol. not only is he the best to play the big man, but he's one of the few all-stars still in the league that went to 4 years of college lol. duncan is the best, but i guess thats not what this thread was about.
what i was getting at this whole time was that morrison has the potential to develop into a rc of the year kind of player, and if he had a mentor he could get there easier.
-
-
12-30-2006, 09:06 PM #32
KG and Shaq!
-
12-30-2006, 09:15 PM #33
shaq is getting old, and kg has never gotten his team a championship. i think duncan gets more credit than he does...
-
-
12-30-2006, 09:47 PM #34
K.gs team is crap and K.Gs mvp was all him he gets no help from his team the timberwolves are pathetic.the spurs have tony parker and ginobli.And when shaq was in his prime he wwas better than duncan.Shaq noow your right is to old.Also i think ben wallace is better than duncan.
-
12-30-2006, 10:10 PM #35
eh, wallace can get the boards and plays great defense, but no one has footwork like duncan, and his jump hook is unstoppable. i stand by what i said, but it is oppinionated. ok, so kg's team is crap and duncan's isnt, but i think duncan could lead the t-wolves to a better season if he traded places with kg.
-
-
12-30-2006, 10:40 PM #36
duncan is good because of his team is what i was trying to say and i also agree with you these topics are very very opinionated and can sometimes start and agrument my case i'd rather have a simple discussion.anyways back on topic.First you said ben wallace can pget the boards and play great d then you say no one can stop duncan.If there is anyone who can stop duncan it is ben wallace and believe me HE CAN!!in my mind h is the best centre because no one can play d like he does and no one brings to the table the amount of leadership he does.The reason why the bulls are doing a lot better is because of him.The spurs they have a lot to work with and have a very good and deep bench (not that the bulls dont) but i think your giving duncan a lot of credit and not as much for other centres.We also can't forget yao either.
-
12-30-2006, 10:49 PM #37
eh..yao is slow and tall, thats it. duncan and wallace have more skill than yao i believe, although yao has developed some skill as well. i think duncan vs. wallace is a great match-up, and i think they have very different styles of play. i dont think that wallace is capable of leading a team to a championship though, the pistons had a very good team, not revolving around one or two players. true, duncan has a great team, when he combines with parker and ginobili, but now that the bulls have wallace, gordon, and hinrich, we should see similar results if wallace is to compare to duncan. i'd say the bulls are too young though, and in a few years, if they can get to a championship, i think i would put wallace equal to, if not better than duncan. it all depends on who he can work with though, hinrich and gordon. they dont compare to parker and ginobili yet. i do think that they are both very good, but as of i now i believe duncan is better.
-
-
12-30-2006, 10:55 PM #38
first off i think the bulls will win a championship for sure if they can keep all their players too much talent not to win one.And i agree the pistons did have a very good team and the spurs pistons match could have gone either way it was 1 game that decided it its not like the spurs swept the pistons right.Also a luol deng and ben gordon would match up with a ginobli and parker for sure.Gordon dropped 40 the other night you dont see parker or ginobli doing that and luol deng defense is excpetional as well as his offense.You'll see in a few or 2 what the bulls have to offer and when the spurs are a little older.Bulls also have hinrich duhon niocioni.to many good players.
-
12-30-2006, 11:00 PM #39
the bulls should be getting there soon. i think that wallace is good because of his boards and defense, but he's no go-to guy like duncan. the only reason why i think they match up pretty closely though is that you can have an off-day on offense, but defense is pretty much always the same. the bulls are young, and should develop into a great team, like what the spurs did. the only difference is that if the spurs had wallace, i dont think they would have won a championship. they needed duncan's scoring, and his defense is good enough.
-
12-30-2006, 11:12 PM #40
yeah you could be right about the spurs thing and i def think the bulls will bring a championship home in a few years.I def agree duncans scoring ability is pretty good just maybe not the best overall centre or pwer forward in the legue let alone all time.i guess mdizz comment kinda got to me about dunca. i mean come on now best of all time thats just dumb.
Last edited by jeremy17; 12-30-2006 at 11:14 PM.
-
