Results 51 to 53 of 53
-
01-10-2008, 05:19 PM #51
I don't really get the hate for Hilliary considering Obama and Edwards are so close to her in voting record its not even funny. Most people would be shocked to learn that all 3 are basically the same on 95% of the issues.
I mean you have Obama talking about how he is the anti war candidate but in 2006 he supported Joe Lieberman over Ned Lamont. For people not in CT and didn't pay attention to the race Lamont was against the war and Lieberman was openly a big supporter and still is of Bush on the war in Iraq.
Why would somebody who says he is so against the war have supported somebody who was so pro war in 2006 other than for the reason that he is just saying it to become President now?
All 3 candidates say that will stop lobbyists in Washington but ALL 3 have lobbyists working for them. All 3 have uttered the words "I am for change" at one point yet none have really passed anything that changed America for the better when they were in the Senate.
I don't like any of them as candidates but at least Clinton would be better dealing with terrorists and terrorist countries unlike Obama and Edwards who have seemed clueless on anything that deals with issues outside of the US. In the post 9/11 world you have to say more than just fantasy talk you actually have to have plans that work in the real world.
So in conclusion I don't see how you can say Edwards or Obama are great candidates and that Hilliary is awful when they act, say, and do almost the same thing. If you think one is awful or great than you should think all 3 are awful or great and I honestly think they are all awful.Selling all my cards here updated as of June------------> Hidden Content
Baseball Autograph and Game Used Only Trade Page: pwaldo.webs.com/
//s123.photobucket.com/albums/o299/pwaldo/
-
-
01-10-2008, 07:56 PM #52
They ALL faked crying and planted questions?
-
01-10-2008, 08:09 PM #53
hillary is such a baby
-
Originally Posted by pwaldo 
