Results 11 to 18 of 18
-
02-17-2009, 05:47 PM #11
I'm not sure I'd call Wilcox "a much better player" than Chandler. Not necessarily a big difference as far as the talent, but someone who has the combination of athleticism and size of Chandler is much more rare.
-
-
02-17-2009, 05:54 PM #12
I have not seen Wilcox enough to say he can't replace Chandler. It is just hard to get 7 footer who takes up space is all. We will see.
-
02-17-2009, 05:56 PM #13
wow this is insane... kinda shocked me when i seen it haha
-
-
02-17-2009, 06:37 PM #14
I've always like Wilcox. He's just a tad bit inconsistant though. That was Chandler's problem as well. But Wilcox can definitly be a double-double beast with a PG as good as Paul.
-
02-17-2009, 06:46 PM #15
I am not worried about him putting up stats with Paul. I am more worried that he is not 7 feet tall and in the lane.
-
-
02-17-2009, 06:55 PM #16
thats what im saying wilcox is a natural PF and if he moves to center he will have some trouble defending the bigger guys
-
02-17-2009, 07:28 PM #17
No doubt Wilcox is a natural PF. Joe Smith and Hilton will split time at the 5 I would imagine.
-
-
02-17-2009, 09:15 PM #18
I'd also add Melvin Ely to that list^^^
But the thing with Chris Wilcox is, he has a bigger body than Chandler and is stronger with his body than Chandler. I can't wait to see the Hornets, and also the Thunder, play with these new big changes in effect. I think this might be one of the rare times that the trade works out to be good for both teams.
-
Originally Posted by juviebest 
