Results 31 to 33 of 33
-
04-19-2009, 11:31 PM #31
-
-
04-23-2009, 03:52 AM #32
Wasn't that exactly what the 'Tea Party' was? Propaganda?
It was nothing until Dick Armey, Newt and others on the right supported it, and Fox News advertised it to death...so it's really someone trying to voice their propaganda over at the propaganda demonstration.
That woman is going nowhere close to unbiased reporting, but when people act like these 'Tea Parties' are a grassroots movement it gives me a good laugh.
-
04-23-2009, 09:30 AM #33

The difference is this woman (and CNN apparently) claims to be a reporter. The people who participated in the TEA parties were protestors, activists. There's a big difference in someone who is supposed to be objectively reporting the news and people who gather to make their opinions heard on a specific subject. The TEA parties are supposed to be propoganda...the news is supposed to be objective. One did what it was supposed to, the other fell far short.
-













