Results 21 to 24 of 24
-
10-12-2009, 09:28 PM #21
I agree. I don't understand why it's wrong when it comes out and says it's custom made.
-
-
10-12-2009, 10:34 PM #22
custom or not, stupid buyers or not, it could possibly be consisdered some kind of copyright infringement by the card company as it is altering their card then reselling. but we all know the companies dont care.
-
10-13-2009, 09:51 AM #23
Valid points for me as well on both sides of the coin, however I think it's no different than getting a Covention stamp on a card, and or just drawing a stick figure on it and finding a buyer for a defaced card.
-
-
10-13-2009, 10:12 AM #24
The only problem that I see with it, is that it still sports the Upper Deck logo, other than that I see no reason why there are any issues with this.
-














