George Zimmerman was Right

[mikesilvia]

Unfortunately now that its in the open about Zimmerman lying about his finances, everything else that may have or not have happened is now questionable because you have to think everything Zimmerman will say is also a lie..

It's obvious that you haven't read up fully on this topic. It was Zimmerman's wife that hid the PayPal money from the court. I watched and heard the audio. Zimmerman's wife may have lied to the court, but Zimmerman never did. Zimmerman remained quiet while his wife spoke and per the Constitution doesn't have to ever say a word in his case.

Also, as usual, people are making judgement based on 10% of the information. Finally, the John Edwards case shows you can lie and be a slime ball and still be found innocent. :)

[habsheaven]

It's obvious that you haven't read up fully on this topic. It was Zimmerman's wife that hid the PayPal money from the court. I watched and heard the audio. Zimmerman's wife may have lied to the court, but Zimmerman never did. Zimmerman remained quiet while his wife spoke and per the Constitution doesn't have to ever say a word in his case.

Also, as usual, people are making judgement based on 10% of the information. Finally, the John Edwards case shows you can lie and be a slime ball and still be found innocent. :)

Apparently you haven't read up fully on the topic either. The court has recorded phone conversations between Zimmerman and his wife in which they are talking in code about how much money they have. Just as a spouse cannot be made to testify against their spouse, it works both ways. Testimony by the spouse reflects on him anyway. The judge would be insane not to make the connection and we know he is not insane because he has said just that.

[mrveggieman]

Apparently you haven't read up fully on the topic either. The court has recorded phone conversations between Zimmerman and his wife in which they are talking in code about how much money they have. Just as a spouse cannot be made to testify against their spouse, it works both ways. Testimony by the spouse reflects on him anyway. The judge would be insane not to make the connection and we know he is not insane because he has said just that.

CHURCH!!

[gladdyontherise]

I haven't read enough about Zimmerman and the whole thing about his money situation to make an accurate comment, but if he did lie, that still can't take away evidence of what a witness said, or photos showing proof, right?

Why do people ignore what Martin had done (such as the fact he was a druggy), but are so quick to make Zimmerman guilty?

I'm just wondering.....

[mrveggieman]

I haven't read enough about Zimmerman and the whole thing about his money situation to make an accurate comment, but if he did lie, that still can't take away evidence of what a witness said, or photos showing proof, right?

Why do people ignore what Martin had done (such as the fact he was a druggy), but are so quick to make Zimmerman guilty?

I'm just wondering.....

So smoking a little bit of weed makes you a druggie? Wow I'm sure that most of the people on here are dope fiends then. Let he who has not sinned throw the first stone.

[gladdyontherise]

So smoking a little bit of weed makes you a druggie? Wow I'm sure that most of the people on here are dope fiends then. Let he who has not sinned throw the first stone.

How do you know it's a "little bit" of weed? I'm 19, not stupid, and I know people his and my age that smoke anything, don't just do "a little bit". I'd be willing to guarantee that he did it almost if not every day.

If Zimmerman had traces of drugs in his system, you would be going on and on and on about it, right?

[habsheaven]

I haven't read enough about Zimmerman and the whole thing about his money situation to make an accurate comment, but if he did lie, that still can't take away evidence of what a witness said, or photos showing proof, right?

Why do people ignore what Martin had done (such as the fact he was a druggy), but are so quick to make Zimmerman guilty?

I'm just wondering.....

The evidence will speak for itself. I am quite sure we haven't seen all of it. And I am not "making Zimmerman guilty" at all. I was commenting on his problem with credibility now. That is it.

[mrveggieman]

How do you know it's a "little bit" of weed? I'm 19, not stupid, and I know people his and my age that smoke anything, don't just do "a little bit". I'd be willing to guarantee that he did it almost if not every day.

If Zimmerman had traces of drugs in his system, you would be going on and on and on about it, right?

How do you know he smoked ever day? Were you with him? Did you smoke with him? Also traces equates to a small amount. There is no hard evidence that Trayvon was a dope fiend.

[gladdyontherise]

How do you know he smoked ever day? Were you with him? Also traces equates to a small amount. There is no hard evidence that Trayvon was a dope fiend.

I don't, just as you don't know anything either, but you claim he was a saint who never did anything wrong and was perfect, so, yea...

I'm just saying that as someone close in age, I know what people of that age do, you act like it's a one time thing, and I'm telling you it wasn't.

[mrveggieman]

I don't, just as you don't know anything either, but you claim he was a saint who never did anything wrong and was perfect, so, yea...

I'm just saying that as someone close in age, I know what people of that age do, you act like it's a one time thing, and I'm telling you it wasn't.

When did I say that he was a saint? I used to also be a teenager a few years ago and know that people back then as well as now used to smoke. Not advocate smoking week but a lot of people are able to smoke and go work/school/church/mosque/snyagouge and contribute as functioning members of society. So your theory of Trayvon being a drug abusing junkie goes up in smoke.