Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Page 5 of 27 FirstFirst ... 234567815 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 265

Thread: Government Shutdown

  
  1. #41
    BANNED



    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,142
    Transferred Feedback
    Freaks (225)
    Country
    See groundsupportse's Items on eBay

    I don't have to show you anything.

    Obamacare went to the Supreme Court and they ruled it was constitutional, they know more than you and I know.


    That was also before Obama changed mandates and other framework to Obamacare.

    There for, it's not even the same bill that Supreme Court ruled on.

    Try again.

  2. #42




    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,503
    SCF Rewards
    800
    Transferred Feedback
    TheBench(150)
    Country
    See tpeichel34's Items on eBay

    It's clear that the Constitution provides the Federal Government with the power to require all people to own at least three My Little Ponies and sign up for at least one BRONY club. Because the Commerce Clause.

  3. #43







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    I don't have to show you anything.

    Obamacare went to the Supreme Court and they ruled it was constitutional, they know more than you and I know.

    Wow what tea bagger site do you get your numbers from?
    But again people from the opposing sides can provide numbers to show who likes or dislikes.

    However, again Daune this law has gone to the Supreme court and ruled Constitutional, or did you miss that day?

    Apparently I am getting my info from some pretty decent sites. But since you chose to toss out the childish little teabagger insult again I feel I should tell you that I am not a member of the Tea Party.

    With that said, hopefully you guys can find a website that explains the difference between something being ruled Constitutional by the Supreme Court (not in violation of your Constitutional rights) and something being Constitutional law (actually written in the Constitution). Maybe then you can quit wasting so much time arguing that you know something you clearly do not.

  4. #44




    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    57
    Posts
    9,435
    SCF Rewards
    376
    Country
    See bodyelectricmethod's Items on eBay

    However, again Daune this law has gone to the Supreme court and ruled Constitutional, or did you miss that day?

    as a tax

  5. #45





    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,461
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)
    Country

    This already went through SCOTUS though. What is there to compromise on something that is already law and deemed constitutional by the people who decide that.

    Hence, my use of "constitutional law."

    Are the Reps arguing semantics too?

  6. #46







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    This already went through SCOTUS though. What is there to compromise on something that is already law and deemed constitutional by the people who decide that.

    Hence, my use of "constitutional law."

    Are the Reps arguing semantics too?

    Actually the libs are arguing semantics. I simply clarified that it is not Constitutional law, although I just said Constitutional because I assumed others would read that you said Constitutional law and grasp the obviousness of my response. My mistake for thinking others would be able to accomplish that. They want to argue that because SCOTUS ruled that it was not un-Constitutional that I am wrong. I am not.
    Last edited by duane1969; 10-01-2013 at 10:59 AM.

  7. #47




    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    738
    SCF Rewards
    450
    Blog Entries
    1
    Transferred Feedback
    TCC (62)
    Country
    St Louis Cardinals
    See bulldogbaseballcardbuyer's Items on eBay

    Here is a link to everything shutting and partially shutting down...

    http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2013/...act/index.html

  8. #48





    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,461
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)
    Country

    Actually the libs are arguing semantics. I simply clarified that it is not Constitutional law, although I just said Constitutional because I assumed others would read that you said Constitutional law and grasp the obviousness of my response. My mistake for thinking others would be able to accomplish that. They want to argue that because SCOTUS ruled that it was not un-Constitutional that I am wrong. I am not.

    So you're arguing semantics.
    "Sure it's not unconstitutional, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's constitutional!" is your argument?

  9. #49







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    So you're arguing semantics.
    "Sure it's not unconstitutional, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's constitutional!" is your argument?

    Ruled Constitutional by SCOTUS means it is not in violation of your Constitutional rights.
    Constitutional law means it is part of the document that is the Constitution.

    There is a very clear and concise difference here. There is nothing semantic about it. The police using radar guns is Constitutional because it doesn't violate our Constitutional rights, but it isn't Constitutional law.

  10. #50





    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,461
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)
    Country

    Exactly. I explained why I used the term and you're still arguing it. Semantics.

    The law is constitutional in the sense it is within the boundaries of the constitution as decided by the Supreme Court.

    Can we flipping move on now?

Page 5 of 27 FirstFirst ... 234567815 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Sponsors



Follow SCF on