Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 93
  1. #11







    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    53,635
    SCF Rewards
    14,926
    Country

    The key part of the ruling says that 30% of Native Americans find the name disparaging. The committee describes this as a "substantial composite" of Native Americans, which establishes that the name is offensive

    Just 30%?
    Selling all my cards here updated as of June------------> Hidden Content

    Baseball Autograph and Game Used Only Trade Page: pwaldo.webs.com/
    //s123.photobucket.com/albums/o299/pwaldo/

  2. #12




    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,585
    SCF Rewards
    728
    Country
    San Francisco Giants
    See sanfran22's Items on eBay

    So the IRS, the NSA, the justice dept, now the patent office. Awesome!

  3. #13





    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    11,225
    SCF Rewards
    1,365
    Country
    New York Yankees Los Angeles Lakers New York Giants
    See ajcorleone's Items on eBay

    Yes you would think at least 50% or more would be offended.But I guess they have better things to worry about that a football team name.Just my guess


  4. #14




    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    57
    Posts
    2,234
    SCF Rewards
    1,033
    Country
    See gsj68's Items on eBay

    and just to play devils advocate,the issue here is a racial physical description for a name,correct?

    http://www.blackfoot.org/default.php
    http://www.omaha.lib.ne.us/transmiss.../flathead.html

    and im sure there are more

  5. #15




    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    57
    Posts
    9,435
    SCF Rewards
    376
    Country
    See bodyelectricmethod's Items on eBay

    This is crap and I hope he fights it to the end. I cannot believe the NFL hasn't backed him.

  6. #16




    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,322
    SCF Rewards
    1,450
    Transferred Feedback
    (10) The Bench
    Country
    See jlzinck's Items on eBay

    HAHAHAHA. MSNBC warned their viewers that they were about to air the word "Redskins"....

  7. #17
    BANNED



    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,142
    Transferred Feedback
    Freaks (225)
    Country
    See groundsupportse's Items on eBay

    HAHAHAHA. MSNBC warned their viewers that they were about to air the word "Redskins"....

    You can't be serious....

    I swear these people are brain washed.

  8. #18




    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    51
    Posts
    10,729
    SCF Rewards
    425
    Country
    See Star_Cards's Items on eBay

    I get the issue with the name Redskins and fall on the side of it needing to be changed. I think they could come up with a name that went along with their logo and rest of their graphics identity. I don't like that the government has taken it upon themselves to revoke a trademark on something that has been trademarked for decades. I'd expect this to be overturned once it hits the legal system. It's a slippery slope when the government gets involved in team name changes. If they want to do that where do they stop? I just don't see how they really have a say. I suppose they know they don't have a say but are just trying to force them to change by messing with their trademark. Seems like a backhanded why to go about getting the name changed. The NCAA did this years ago... I think in the 90's. They changed team mascot names for any team that may have been linked to native americans. The Seminoles had to fight to get around the ruling if I remember correctly. I think they got approval in writing from the Seminole tribe. I personally don't see any issue with any of the pro team names that have native american backgrounds other then Redskins. The other all seem to take a positive twist on their use. Although I'd think that the Cleveland Indians logo would be at least at the same level of offensiveness as the name Redskins.

  9. #19





    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,461
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)
    Country

    They didn't just get approval from the Seminole tribe. The tribe was as proud to be associated with that school as anyone. If memory serves, they actually had representatives fighting with the school to keep the name. The thing is, it was a tribal name in honor of said tribe, not a derogatory term. Redskin is a derogatory term, AND lumps all tribes into the same group. I have the same problem with the Cleveland Indians, but don't think any government faction should be making this decision.

  10. #20







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    I love how these Native Americans are so offended by the name "Redskins" but they take no offense at the Cleveland Indian logo which makes Native Americans look like doofus grinning morons. I think Snyder needs to give in to the empty-can movement and rename the team the "Washington Crybaby Liberals" since the only people who give a crap is a bunch of thin-skinned liberals who have nothing better to do with their pathetic lives than make a big deal over a small issue.

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Sponsors



Follow SCF on