Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 55
  1. #1




    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    38
    Posts
    10,279
    SCF Rewards
    1,278
    Country
    See ntgiants612's Items on eBay

    NY Post Comic: Tasteless?

    http://www.nypost.com/delonas/delonas.htm

    Take a look and judge for yourself. I doubt the comic was directly referring to Obama but you still have to have the judgment to know people are going to make that assumption.

    If it was directed at Obama, then wow.

  2. #2




    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,627
    Country

    wow...that's impressive

    even better was when i clicked the link, i got one of those pop up ads saying "Should Obama pull the troops from Iraq"...LOL

  3. #3




    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,116
    Country
    See aw00d05's Items on eBay

    Wait the NY Post wrote this? It's a miracle! They usually just kiss *** to Dems, but about the photo, that's in terrible taste...

  4. #4




    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    38
    Posts
    10,279
    SCF Rewards
    1,278
    Country
    See ntgiants612's Items on eBay

    Wait the NY Post wrote this? It's a miracle! They usually just kiss *** to Dems, but about the photo, that's in terrible taste...

    Sean Delonas is the comic who drew it. I'm assuming his comics are routinely in the NY Post.

  5. #5




    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    45
    Posts
    15,714
    SCF Rewards
    1,665
    Blog Entries
    2
    Country
    See onepimptiger's Items on eBay

    I don't think that was referring to Obama. First, he doesn't write bills, that's up to Congress. Beyond that, I've heard many times things referred to as written by a bunch of monkeys...and the theory (don't think that's the right word) that given enough time, monkeys with typewriters would end up producing Shakespeare (or something like that). I took it to mean that Conress is a bunch of monkeys, referring to their intelligence level, nothing racial.

    I can see how it could be misconstrued, but I don't think it was intended that way and anyone who knows how bills are written wouldn't think it was referring to Obama. Maybe they should have realized that not all people are that intelligent and may take it the wrong way, but I don't really think it was in bad taste.



  6. #6




    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    45
    Posts
    15,714
    SCF Rewards
    1,665
    Blog Entries
    2
    Country
    See onepimptiger's Items on eBay

    Wait the NY Post wrote this? It's a miracle! They usually just kiss *** to Dems, but about the photo, that's in terrible taste...

    The NY Times is the completely left rag, I think the Post is either moderate or perhaps even conservative

  7. #7




    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    38
    Posts
    10,279
    SCF Rewards
    1,278
    Country
    See ntgiants612's Items on eBay

    I don't think that was referring to Obama. First, he doesn't write bills, that's up to Congress. Beyond that, I've heard many times things referred to as written by a bunch of monkeys...and the theory (don't think that's the right word) that given enough time, monkeys with typewriters would end up producing Shakespeare (or something like that). I took it to mean that Conress is a bunch of monkeys, referring to their intelligence level, nothing racial.

    I can see how it could be misconstrued, but I don't think it was intended that way and anyone who knows how bills are written wouldn't think it was referring to Obama. Maybe they should have realized that not all people are that intelligent and may take it the wrong way, but I don't really think it was in bad taste.

    I know Congress writes bills, but you can't discount the fact that Obama is seemingly the "face" of this bill or at least pushing for it to be passed. Granted the comic does call for shooting the person who wrote it.

    It should be a group of monkeys though, not a single monkey.

  8. #8




    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    45
    Posts
    15,714
    SCF Rewards
    1,665
    Blog Entries
    2
    Country
    See onepimptiger's Items on eBay

    I know Congress writes bills, but you can't discount the fact that Obama is seemingly the "face" of this bill or at least pushing for it to be passed. Granted the comic does call for shooting the person who wrote it.

    It should be a group of monkeys though, not a single monkey.

    Yeah I see what you mean. There are definitely some aspects that seem questionable, like they should've thought better of it.

  9. #9




    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    197
    SCF Rewards
    350
    Country
    See (dobie)'s Items on eBay

    Umm... if this is about Obama, this is beyond bad taste. Its one thing to mock policies, ideas, or exaggerate facial features. Its another to compare our president to a dead, bullet-riddled monkey. Regardless of the side of the aisle.

    I'm HOPING the author was TRYING to say that any "monkey" could come up with this bill, and its a bad idea. If that's what he was trying to get across, he did so poorly, and in a really stupid fashion.

  10. #10




    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,116
    Country
    See aw00d05's Items on eBay

    I don't think that was referring to Obama. First, he doesn't write bills, that's up to Congress. Beyond that, I've heard many times things referred to as written by a bunch of monkeys...and the theory (don't think that's the right word) that given enough time, monkeys with typewriters would end up producing Shakespeare (or something like that). I took it to mean that Conress is a bunch of monkeys, referring to their intelligence level, nothing racial.

    I can see how it could be misconstrued, but I don't think it was intended that way and anyone who knows how bills are written wouldn't think it was referring to Obama. Maybe they should have realized that not all people are that intelligent and may take it the wrong way, but I don't really think it was in bad taste.

    I can see your point, but it just looks too shaky to not say it COULD be racist. But I can see your point.

Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Sponsors



Follow SCF on