Results 71 to 80 of 98
-
10-30-2009, 08:14 PM #71
Wow a general statement without any evidence. I did not think you would do this. No wait a minute...
I'm just an innocent bystander making an observational comment now...remember, you intellectualized me into submission and declared yourself the victor, Dr. Danth.
-
-
10-30-2009, 09:12 PM #72
and please provide me all of the names that say they do, just as I have provided the names to you please
-
10-30-2009, 11:02 PM #73
This is the type of information I am looking for sir. Scientists who study the topic, not anyone with a general knowledge of science.
http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf
But you think anyone with a masters or doctorate knows something about climate change. This is called confirmation bias. Show me a report of people who study the climate saying is not happening and I will agree.
I know reading to the end can be hard so please start with the last paragraph of the paper.
-
-
10-30-2009, 11:03 PM #74
Once again where is your information sir? As usual no answers. Once again misapplying logic. It is quite funny. Keep it up. LOL.
-
10-30-2009, 11:23 PM #75
Well, it was just earlier in this thread, I didn't think you would have already forgotten...you really do have a reading comprehension problem, don't you? To refresh your memory:
I just wanted to point out your denial of the truth and I have succeeded.
Do not try it again. I will no let you do it.
I know where the good scientific information points to. You do not.
I have the truth. You do not.The argument is over.
And can't forget the best one:
I have won.
It's like a blooper reel...
-
-
10-31-2009, 07:31 AM #76
Love this right here
"But you think anyone with a masters or doctorate knows something about climate change. This is called confirmation bias. Show me a report of people who study the climate saying is not happening and I will agree."
The fact that you discredit anybody who has a Masters or doctorate simply because they cant possibly have done any research on anything because they do not have the right title?? I dont know if you have any friends, but I have a close family freind who at one point in his life was a physicist and decided to become a MD later.
Why can a person who has a masters not be in a scientific field of study which you straight out think they can't
and Once again I ask you to please provide me all of the names that say they do, just as I have provided the names to you please
-
10-31-2009, 10:54 AM #77
Sir, I gave you credidable evidence. I will accpet those people's opinion when what they have a degree in is listed, not until then. You could have someone with a philosphoy PhD that never study the climate saying that global warming is not real. I am sorry you are blinded to what makes good evidence.
I am sorry you only look for infromation that goes with your preconcieve notions. I am sorry you can not see this is a legimate criticism. I am sorry you can not take apart the article I presented about Earth scientists. Did you even read it?
A physicist studies physcis, not Earth sciences. Sorry they can not have a reliable expert opinion on global warming. Also the poll is unscientific and does not name is faults which any good scientific research does. It does not hold to a scieintific standard because it was not a random poll. It is just people signing a petition. Big deal, they placed there name on a petition. I could put my name on that petition just for fun.
I know I keep repeating myself, because you people do not understand what makes credible sources in science.
-
-
10-31-2009, 11:24 AM #78
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
funniest post of the day coming from you. Thanks man! I needed that this morning
-
10-31-2009, 12:59 PM #79
You do not understand and I am not surprised. You think science changes all of the time. And as usual, another general statement without evidence.
This what you people make me do.
It is really like talking to the wall.
Please make more general statements without evidence, all of you.
LOL. LOL.
-
10-31-2009, 01:05 PM #80
"A physicist studies physcis, not Earth sciences" Thanks for the update there DOC. as usual you missed the point that it is possible for people to switch from one field to another.
I know it is hard to understand.
"I am sorry you only look for infromation that goes with your preconcieve notions. I am sorry you can not see this is a legimate criticism. I am sorry you can not take apart the article I presented about Earth scientists. Did you even read it?"
Actually I did read it and I found a few flaws. First off right off the bat I will throw out 7 percent due to the fact they only have masters degress. And another 5-7 percent I will throw out because they study Palentology. So 10-12 percent I have already discredited.
And another 30-35 percent of the poll you presented it does not state what they do , So we are up to 40 percent give or take so now we are looking at around 1900 people surveyed that would fit under you qualifications.
I have provided a link to census data from 2000. If anything the number will be around the same or higher when the 2010 census data come out.
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet...-redoLog=false
Minority Opinion anyone?
By the way if you had bothered to read anything in the other global warming threads you will see right there in black and white that I think it is happening and I think that we as humams have some effect just not sure how much. So before you say that I am only looking for data that supports my side of things you may want to go back into some other threads and take a look.
and Once again I ask you to please provide me all of the names that say they do, just as I have provided the names to you please
-
Originally Posted by drtom2005 
