I am for re-distribution

[AUTaxMan]

It could also mean; move resources from one agency/district/department which is over-funded and give them to another that is under-funded.

But that's not what it means.

[habsheaven]

But that's not what it means.

That may not be the definition you want to use, but I assure you that is a correct usage of the word. Whether you like it or not.

[AUTaxMan]

That may not be the definition you want to use, but I assure you that is a correct usage of the word. Whether you like it or not.

Of course it is, but that is now how it was being used in the clip that is the subject of this debate.

[habsheaven]

Of course it is, but that is now how it was being used in the clip that is the subject of this debate.

I just listened to the entire audio of his talk. He doesn't mention re-distribution until approx the 30 minute mark. And he uses the word EXACTLY in the context in which I defined it. You might want to take a listen to it yourself.

[Wickabee]

I just listened to the entire audio of his talk. He doesn't mention re-distribution until approx the 30 minute mark. And he uses the word EXACTLY in the context in which I defined it. You might want to take a listen to it yourself.

It's different if you've made up your mind before you listen it...

[AUTaxMan]

I just listened to the entire audio of his talk. He doesn't mention re-distribution until approx the 30 minute mark. And he uses the word EXACTLY in the context in which I defined it. You might want to take a listen to it yourself.

I have listened to it, and i completely disagree with your analysis.

[Wickabee]

I have listened to it, and i completely disagree with your analysis.

See what I mean, Habs?

[habsheaven]

See what I mean, Habs?

LOL, Yeah, I know. I should know better than to expect so much out of them.