Results 91 to 100 of 119
-
11-22-2006, 04:39 AM #91
Stupid argument! So you are just not wanting Michigan because when they lost the game? If they would have played Ohio St in week 1 and lost, that would be different? Your argument is stupid. Ohio St is the best team in the country. Michigan proved they are second best. Let's see the rematch! By the way, you called me a Michigan slappy! LOL! I am a Miami Hurricanes fan! You have no leg to stand on bud.
-
-
11-22-2006, 04:47 AM #92
With USC just a few percentage points behind Michigan, does anyone thing that USC will leapfrog Michigan if USC beats Notre Dame and UCLA?
-
11-22-2006, 05:34 AM #93
They absolutly will. Strength of schedule will improve for USC, and will diminish for Michigan since ND would then have 2 losses. But still, Michigan will have lost to #1 on the road, and USC will have lost to Oregon State!
-
-
11-22-2006, 11:18 AM #94
Originally Posted by theproudestmonkey
First off i dontmake the rules i just read about them.... If Michigan is ranked at the number 2 team in America.. they get the nod... no questions asked... according to the system the BCS has in place they are the second best team so that is who i want to see in the big game... If USC or Florida moves ahead of them then i say go with the team that deserves it. What i am saying is dont punish Michigan for losing one game... every other team has also lost at least one so why do they deserve it more? The only difference is Michigan lost to the best team in the country where USC and Florida did not. I just dont see how you can punish Michigan for losing against number 1 on the road... as someone said above.. if Texas was in michigans place, lost to OSU only in the second game of the season but ran the table otherwise, you would want to see Texas and OSU...
and for the fight... until someone else beat the number one contender they should get the nod... if the number 3 or 4 guy beats numnber 2 then they get a shot.. it really has nothing to do with college football though as the number 3, 4, 5 dont get their shot at the number 2 team
-
11-22-2006, 02:18 PM #95
to answers some questions that were posed to me (since i DO have a leg to stand on, and shoulders to support my point of view), no i dont think that any team who has already played the number 1 should have a shot (texas, michigan, etc)....I am wanting to see who the best team in the country is....seeing michigan lose to osu again will not prove that to me, when there are other very viable options in USC or the SEC champion!!
peter - you can call my opinion STUPID all you want....you are just making yourself sound stupid with your wording!! and i NEVER said you were a michigan fan...i said "you are starting to SOUND like a bitter michigan fan"....dont put words in my mouth!!
its kinda funny that the computers are the only factor in the BCS that has Michigan ranked above SC, the 1 factor who DOES NOT watch football!!! the harris voters already have SC above michigan, and so do the coaches!! michigan is just not that impressive in my eyes, and i live in big 10 country and saw lots of their games.
it really isn't gonna matter, cause if SC wins out, michigan has NO SHOT!!
-
-
11-23-2006, 04:27 PM #96
you are just making yourself sound stupid with your wording!!
LOL, look how you write all of your posts, it looks like you have a 3rd graders english education.
seeing michigan lose to osu again will not prove that to me, when there are other very viable options in USC or the SEC champion!!
USC and everyone else in the SEC has one loss just like Michigan. So whats the big deal of seeing a rematch??? The only difference is that Michigans loss came ot the number 1 team in the nation on the road by 3 points, and USC's loss was to Oregon State. This really shouldnt be an arguement, Michigan should be in that title game but there not because there getting screwed over because there loss came on the last game of the season.
-
11-23-2006, 05:30 PM #97
Originally Posted by nman0808
you point out ANYTHING that i ever write on these boards that makes my education look like a 3rd grader!! i am college educated, unlike you who is still a highschooler!! my puncuation is never perfect due to being swift with my typing, but my grammar is just fine!! glad to see you have nothing better to do than comment on things that weren't even directed at you!!
-
-
11-23-2006, 09:31 PM #98
Ive only talked to you in the NCAA forum and we have different opions.
I also made comments on Michigans shot at the title game.
-
11-23-2006, 09:44 PM #99
Originally Posted by nman0808
well you dont need to call me out like im a 3rd grader man!! i have NEVER made any derogatory comments towards anyone on this site UNLESS they made comments towards me first....i have no problem at all with peoples opinions...if i have a different one, i will express it and try and "convince" you of my point of view!! i ALWAYS back up my opinions with as many FACTS as possible (which i have done continuously in this thread!!)....i have made numerous points here as to why michigan and the big 10 aren't as strong as the BCS makes them out to be.
remember, when i made my comment about peter's statement being "stupid", it was after he refered to mine as "stupid"....im never the instigator, but i wont back down if my if im "called out" or "degraded" with such words!! i can handle my own when it comes to sports, im a college grad with a bachelors degree, i have my own business, and im not gonna sit here and let you tell me "i act / talk like a 3rd grader!!".....once again, back up your talk!!! show me a post ANYWHERE on here where im grammer is bad!! i dont use caps at the beginning of sentences, and i rarely end sentences (prefer .... when on message boards or writing email) but i guarantee im twice as educated as you!! you aren't even in college yet man!! that was quite insulting!!
-
11-26-2006, 05:21 PM #100
Michigan's only hope lies with UCLA
-
