Results 121 to 130 of 199
-
07-11-2009, 06:30 AM #121
But is that only if you use the SCF Card Database for your cards, not if you have a bucket or something, right?
-
-
07-11-2009, 09:05 AM #122
This is gonna be great! Thanks to all who put the time and effert into making this
-
07-11-2009, 09:22 AM #123
Beckett assassins!!
I love it so much...just dropped $216 for a year's worth of total access on Beckett and instantaneously can no longer access anything over there...all i see now are ads that they are the best in the business...ironic i know...
anyway, the good w/ the bad and this looks really good...
***update: i just got to my homepage on Beckett after trying for 27 minutes at 9:27 AM on Saturday...got to my SCF homepage in 2 seconds i think...then again, maybe it was 3 seconds...Last edited by jeff341024; 07-11-2009 at 09:33 AM.
-
-
07-11-2009, 10:18 AM #124
I think it is great also, a ton of work, but great none the less.
I personally would like to see information based on averages.
In other words the High Value the Low Value and the average value.
In other words the Most a card sold for, the least it sold for and the Average it sells at.
Same with BV if you look a card up in Beckett, Tuff Stuff, and other sources, big books, online sites you’ll get a different Value. Having High, Low and average value.
Overall I would like to see the information separately per card, BV and SV.
That’s just my 2 cents.
Anyway SCF does it, will be tons better than the way it’s currently done.
I’d also like to see sales not just Rip off Bay sales but others factored in. Or only list the average sale price. I can see horrors with people demanding to buy at lowest sale ever and then only selling at the highest ever.
Actually I think only listing Average Values would be more beneficial.
The only other thought I had would be maybe in the future being able to tag cards in the Guide, so someone can actually track their collection, and make listing and tracking collections easier. I know it takes tons of time for me to figure out what I have at one time.
Anyway thanks again for taking SCF into the future of collecting.
This is the best site on the Net period, thanks for all of your hard work and the time you
Guys/Gals put in.
I know that a Racing Guide alone would be needed as none of the current sources bother to update only once or twice a year, despite sets being put out monthly.
Thanks again.
-
07-11-2009, 12:46 PM #125
Thanks for this,looking good,great job!
-
-
07-11-2009, 12:57 PM #126
Looks good. Thanks for the effort.

Rich
-
07-11-2009, 01:38 PM #127
You know what'd make me bust a nut?
A function that separates cards into various values, say under fifty, over fifty, and over 200. After doing that, you query the table and historical data over the last 3 months (query based on Last Name, or Player_ID) and average the rise/fall of the prices of each freakin' card.
You list the top ten players, not single cards, in terms of improvement.
The thing is, there's almost certainly open source software for monitoring stocks that'd take 10 hours and a couple beers to edit into an insanely useful program that spits out unbelievable functions for card performance because once you have that..
You can start determining correlation coefficients w/ various random events.
:D
-
-
07-11-2009, 01:44 PM #128
That sounds like a cool idea, see whch players cards are hot and which aren't.
-
07-11-2009, 04:42 PM #129
Anybody know what sports will be listed in opg
-
07-11-2009, 04:50 PM #130
All sports will be... do you have a concern over a certain sport you would like to see?
-














