Signs?MEME's and the like!

[MadMan1978]

I found this to be a bit humorous

[MadMan1978]

Nice Vanity Plate

[duane1969]

The funny thing is the liberal left wants to feed the hungry, heal the sick and house the homeless...with someone else's money.

[duane1969]

Nice Vanity Plate

Typical liberal meme. It doesn't require tax payers to pay "extra taxes" for specialized plates. Gotta love it when uninformed liberals create inaccurate memes for other uninformed liberals to enjoy and take pleasure in.

[habsheaven]

The funny thing is the liberal left wants to feed the hungry, heal the sick and house the homeless...with someone else's money.

Funny thing is: if they had the money they wouldn't be hungry, sick or homeless. So of course you have to use someone else's money. Whose money did Jesus propose liberals use?

[duane1969]

Funny thing is: if they had the money they wouldn't be hungry, sick or homeless. So of course you have to use someone else's money. Whose money did Jesus propose liberals use?

I am not religious, so I don't know. I am just tired of hearing how "we" should help everyone else but the answer is always to take "their" money to do it.

[shrewsbury]

Funny thing is: if they had the money they wouldn't be hungry, sick or homeless. So of course you have to use someone else's money. Whose money did Jesus propose liberals use?

funny thing is a huge majority could be/should be working and they would not need someone else's money. if the government created jobs rather than dependency we would be better off.

the government should have just regulated the health care system, instead of wasting all this money and time.

and we practice separation of church and state, so for me to force upon others what I believe Jesus would do, is not how the show runs.

but for the sake of answering, when they are hungry He teaches them how to supply their own, or He feeds them with what He has. if they are sick He heals them with what He has, He was not robin hood.

[habsheaven]

funny thing is a huge majority could be/should be working and they would not need someone else's money. if the government created jobs rather than dependency we would be better off.

the government should have just regulated the health care system, instead of wasting all this money and time.

and we practice separation of church and state, so for me to force upon others what I believe Jesus would do, is not how the show runs.

but for the sake of answering, when they are hungry He teaches them how to supply their own, or He feeds them with what He has. if they are sick He heals them with what He has, He was not robin hood.

a huge majority? Where did you come up with that stat? I can just as easily state that a huge majority are the WORKING poor. How does a government create jobs? (other than by creating a bloated military).

What does "just regulated" mean? And isn't "regulation" a bad word?

Yes, you practice separation of church and state. What does that have to do with societies and morals? Can you list all the successful societies that DID NOT practice charity through the laws of the land?

I must of missed it. What was Jesus's job? Where did he get his wealth? Where did he get his medicine? His magical powers do not extend to the rest of us. At least Robin Hood worked with the realities of the situation.

[duane1969]

a huge majority? Where did you come up with that stat? I can just as easily state that a huge majority are the WORKING poor. How does a government create jobs? (other than by creating a bloated military).

What does "just regulated" mean? And isn't "regulation" a bad word?

Yes, you practice separation of church and state. What does that have to do with societies and morals? Can you list all the successful societies that DID NOT practice charity through the laws of the land?

I must of missed it. What was Jesus's job? Where did he get his wealth? Where did he get his medicine? His magical powers do not extend to the rest of us. At least Robin Hood worked with the realities of the situation.

The government doesn't "create" jobs. Obama proved that. However, with a leader in chanrge that understand the concept of business growth the government can create situations that result in jobs. Handing someone a free check isn't one of them tho.

As for your Robin Hood comment, he was fictional and even the fictional Robin Hood was a criminal, not a hero. However, he is a great example of the liberal ideal...forcibly take from people who have and give it to people who have not while giving nothing of your own and then pat yourself on the back for your pseudo-grand accomplishment.

[habsheaven]

The government doesn't "create" jobs. Obama proved that. However, with a leader in chanrge that understand the concept of business growth the government can create situations that result in jobs. Handing someone a free check isn't one of them tho.

As for your Robin Hood comment, he was fictional and even the fictional Robin Hood was a criminal, not a hero. However, he is a great example of the liberal ideal...forcibly take from people who have and give it to people who have not while giving nothing of your own and then pat yourself on the back for your pseudo-grand accomplishment.

There are many ways in which the government can directly create jobs although yes it is better for the private sector to do the creating. Obama hasn't proved anything. The "government" includes the GOP, and their record during Obama's term proves they do not have job creation as a priority. To you Robin Hood may be a criminal, to others he would be a hero and the rich would be the criminals. Not unlike the real world when you drill down into it.