SHAQ to CLEVELAND?????????

[XxViSiOnxX]

Could this be True????

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns...sshaq0614.html

[JesRey]

That would be a scary lineup, and maybe the Cavs would win more games because Lebron wouldn't hold onto the ball for 20 of the 24 seconds on the shot clock. Shaq would want his share of the ball

[troygoesdeep]

I think this would be a great trade for both teams. The Suns sell tickets by there fast pace game which shaq only slows down also the Cavs need a big man to help guard Dwight Howard and other big men. Plus this saves the Suns some money

[selby56]

The Cavs could have had Shaq at the trade deadline...they offered Wally for Shaq, the Suns said no, but they said would take Wally AND Sasha for Shaq, but for some reason, which is beyond me, the Cavs said no. Two overpayed bench players for one of the most dominate big men of all time...

[jeebus86]

I think he could really help cleveland, besides giving them a big man, he also provides championship experience. Only problem I see is that he's gonna be clogging up the inside way too much, and Lebron may not have much room to drive down the middle. But this is stuff teams address and figure out during training camp and pre-season.

[drtom2005]

Shaq has one year left on his deal correct. Do it Cleveland. Do it.

[nadeau01_johnson48]

Ferry needs to pull the trigger and make this happen.....IMO, Shaq puts the Cavs over the top.

BUT....if the Cavs win a Championship with him, all we'll hear about is how LeBron can't win one without Shaq....haha.

[gladdyontherise]

Ferry needs to pull the trigger and make this happen.....IMO, Shaq puts the Cavs over the top.

BUT....if the Cavs win a Championship with him, all we'll hear about is how LeBron can't win one without Shaq....haha.

bolded part will be the last of my response..

I agree with you (wierd how we could agree to something involving the Cavs) that they need Shaq, should've done this at the trade deadline though...

However, it would be a true statement if the Cavs won it all next year, it would be because of Shaq, even if LeBron is the superstar, he needs Shaq or some other big man to get a title..besides Cavs need to show Bron there serious about winning with him being in the last year of his contract

[nadeau01_johnson48]

Exactly....Shaq comes off the books after 09-10. It makes perfect sense. The only problem IMO is that if they do win a Championship next year, the front office might think it would make sense to resign Shaq and not go after a young big man, which is what we really need down the road...

[tarheelsnipe]

Moreover, Shaq's legacy would certainly benefit. I'm sure he's thinking about it, too. His ego is as big as he is, and he'd love the chance to add another ring.